10 Best Zoho BugTracker Alternatives for Modern Dev Teams

Modern software teams need strong tools to spot, track, and fix bugs fast. Zoho BugTracker is one option, but many teams outgrow its simplicity. They need tools that scale, link tightly to code, support agile workflows, or bring automation and visibility across dev teams. The right bug tracking alternative makes work more transparent, reduces context switching, and helps teams fix issues faster.

In this list, we look at 10 of the best tool choices that replace or outperform Zoho BugTracker. These tools cover a range of needs — from lightweight issue tracking for small teams to enterprise-ready systems with deep planning workflows. You’ll also find visual QA tools, open-source systems, and simple email-centric trackers. This guide helps you understand what features matter, compare options at a glance, and choose the right fit for your software development processes.

Whether you lead a small engineering team or a large agile squad, understanding these alternatives will help you choose better bug tracking software that fits your workflow, budget, and project goals.

What Should You Look For in Zoho BugTracker Alternatives?

Choosing an alternative to Zoho BugTracker means knowing your team’s needs and priorities. Here are the key things to consider:

Workflow Power and Customization:
Look for tools that let you build the workflows your team actually follows — from backlog to fix to release. This includes custom issue types, statuses, and rule automations that reflect real processes rather than forcing your team to adapt to the tool.

Visibility and Reporting:
Teams benefit when they can see progress, blockers, and trends at a glance. Strong dashboards, reports, and metrics help engineering leaders plan sprints and understand team velocity.

Integrations with Dev Tools:
Issue trackers must work with version control, CI/CD pipelines, code review tools, and chat systems. Native links to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or other SCMs reduce context switching and keep work connected to code changes.

User Experience:
A modern UI with boards, lists, forms, filters, and search helps both technical and non-technical users stay productive. Tools with clean interfaces reduce onboarding time and support team adoption.

Pricing and Value:
Understand the tool’s pricing model — free tiers, per-user subscriptions, and add-on costs. Choose an alternative that fits your budget while delivering the necessary features.

Scalability:
As your team or project grows, your bug tracker should scale too. Some tools serve small teams well but struggle with enterprise needs, while others are built to handle large, distributed engineering teams.

By focusing on these key areas, you can pick an alternative that aligns with your workflow, collaboration needs, and growth plans while improving how your teams track and resolve bugs.

Zoho BugTracker Alternatives at a Glance

Here’s a quick side-by-side view of the top bug tracker alternatives so you can compare their best use cases, standout features, and pricing range:

This table gives a snapshot of each tool’s positioning and cost so you can plan which ones to explore in depth later. Prices are based on current public plans and may vary with billing cycles or editions.

1. ClickUp (Best for unified testing workflows with templates, automation, and AI)

ClickUp is a comprehensive work management platform used by software teams to manage bugs, tasks, sprints, and releases in one system. It brings issue tracking, automation, customizable workflows, and AI-assisted tools together so developers and QA teams can build tracking processes that match their way of working. Users can view bugs as lists, boards, or timelines. ClickUp’s automation rules let teams trigger actions like moving tasks or assigning owners based on changes. Built-in time tracking, goals, and reporting help teams stay on schedule and measure performance over time. ClickUp also supports integrations with developer tools so code updates and notifications flow seamlessly into issue tracking.

Best features

• Flexible task and issue workflows that adapt to team needs

• Multiple view options such as lists, Kanban boards, and charts

• Task automation that reduces manual work on repetitive steps

• Built-in time tracking and workload management tools

• AI-powered features like task summaries and suggestions

• Native communication tools like comments and notifications

• Integrations with Git systems, Slack, and other work tools

Limitations

• The wide range of features can feel overwhelming for new users

• Performance may slow when many teams use large ClickUp workspaces

• Some users report confusion with template and field settings

• Advanced workflow automations are only available on higher plans

Pricing

ClickUp pricing is as follows:

• Free Plan – $0 per user per month with basic tasks and boards

• Unlimited Plan – $7 per user per month billed annually

• Business Plan – $12 per user per month billed annually

• Business Plus Plan – $19 per user per month billed annually

• Enterprise Plan – Custom pricing based on needs

Ratings and reviews

ClickUp earns consistently high user satisfaction scores from teams of all sizes. Reviewers highlight its flexibility, customizable workflows, and automation. Some teams note a learning curve for new users but overall praise the value and comprehensive capabilities.

2. Jira (Best for large agile teams that need deep workflows)

Jira is an agile project and issue tracking platform widely used by development teams to plan, track, and release software. It is built to support Scrum and Kanban frameworks and includes deep workflow customization so teams can tailor statuses, fields, and transitions to match their processes. Jira’s boards help teams manage backlogs, plan sprints, and monitor progress. Reporting tools show velocity, sprint burndown, and cycle time. Jira also connects easily with other tools in the software development ecosystem, and it is trusted by medium and enterprise teams that require strict access controls and compliance.

Best features

• Advanced Scrum and Kanban boards for agile teams

• Workflow customization with custom statuses and transitions

• Backlog planning, sprint tracking, and release management

• Built-in reports like velocity charts and burndown metrics

• Permissions and roles for secure, multi-team collaboration

• Integrations with development tools, repositories, and CI systems

Limitations

• Can be complex to set up and configure for non-technical users

• Some features require add-ons or marketplace apps

• The interface can feel dense without careful customization

• More time may be required for administrators to manage workflows

Pricing

Jira pricing tiers are:

• Free Plan – $0 for up to 10 users with basic issue tracking

• Standard Plan – $8.15 per user per month billed monthly

• Premium Plan – $16.10 per user per month billed monthly

• Enterprise Plan – Organization-wide pricing based on scale

Ratings and reviews

Jira consistently ranks high with development teams for its flexible agile support and enterprise readiness. Users appreciate its deep customization, reporting power, and ecosystem connections. Some teams rate it as steeper learning compared to lightweight tools but valuable for complex workflows.

3. GitLab (Best for dev-first issue tracking with built-in CI/CD)

GitLab is a single application that combines Git repository management, CI/CD pipelines, monitoring, and issue tracking. For development teams that want their bug tracker closely tied to code changes and deployment processes, GitLab provides native issue boards, boards linked to merge requests, and automation through pipelines. Issues in GitLab connect directly with branches and merge requests so teams can see the full trace from bug discovery to fix and deployment. The platform also offers advanced security and compliance features on higher tiers, making it a fit for regulated environments.

Best features

• Built-in issue boards with customizable pipelines

• CI/CD automation included in the platform

• Code review, merge requests, and branch management in one system

• Visibility into test pipelines and deployments

• Project dashboards with progress and priority insights

Limitations

• Some advanced CI/CD and enterprise options require paid plans

• Issue tracking is less workflow-rich than dedicated bug trackers

• Interface has a learning curve for new users

• Some premium analytics and security features increase subscription cost

Pricing

GitLab pricing includes:

• Free Plan – $0 per user per month with basic issue tracking and CI minutes

• Premium Plan – $29 per user per month billed annually

• Ultimate Plan – $99 per user per month billed annually

Ratings and reviews

Users rate GitLab highly for combining code, CI/CD, and issue tracking into one platform. Development-first teams often highlight its pipeline automation and repository features. Some note that advanced functionality is only available at higher pricing tiers, but overall GitLab earns strong marks for efficiency and integration.

4. Wrike (Best for cross-functional intake and stakeholder visibility)

Wrike is a flexible work management platform that helps teams coordinate tasks, bugs, and project work from planning to delivery. It is designed for cross-functional teams that need a clear view of work intake, priorities, and progress. Wrike lets teams build custom request forms that standardize how bugs and issues are reported. It also provides dashboards and reporting tools to show stakeholders what’s happening in real time. Wrike’s views include folders, boards, timeline (Gantt), and workload charts. While not a dedicated bug tracker, its customization options let development and QA teams create powerful tracking workflows that adapt to many use cases.

Best features

• Custom request forms for standardized bug reporting

• Multiple views including board, list, timeline, and workload charts

• Real-time reporting dashboards for stakeholders

• Task dependencies and Gantt timelines for planning

• Integration with communication tools and developer platforms

• Automated workflows and rule-based task assignments

Limitations

• Not as focused on software development as specialized trackers

• Some users find the interface complex at first

• Advanced features can require higher pricing tiers

• Reporting setup may require configuration effort

Pricing

Wrike’s pricing structure includes:

• Free Plan – $0 for basic task management and board views

• Team Plan – $9.80 per user per month billed annually

• Business Plan – $24.80 per user per month billed annually

• Wrike for Marketers and Wrike for Professional Services – custom pricing

• Enterprise Plan – custom pricing based on organization needs

Ratings and reviews

Wrike is well rated for its flexibility and visibility into work. Users appreciate the customizable dashboards and cross-team views. Some teams mention the learning curve for advanced features as a challenge, but overall reviews are strong for coordination and visibility.

5. monday dev (Best for visual planning and stakeholder-friendly roadmaps)

monday dev, part of the monday.com platform, is a visual planning and tracking tool tailored for development teams. It provides boards, timelines, and roadmaps that make it easy to see bug status, progress, and priorities at a glance. With color-coded boards and customizable fields, teams can adapt monday dev to support issue tracking, sprint planning, and stakeholder communication. Its visual nature makes it especially useful for non-technical stakeholders who need a simple view of development progress and upcoming bug fixes.

Best features

• Highly visual boards with custom fields

• Timeline views and roadmaps for planning

• Collaboration features that link conversations to tasks

• Status updates and automation rules

• Integration with code and chat tools for smooth tracking

Limitations

• Some advanced development-centric features are less deep than dedicated tools

• Roadmaps for multiple teams can get crowded without careful setup

• Pricing increases as more features or seats are added

• Some users find the interface better suited for high-level views than detailed issue workflows

Pricing

monday dev pricing generally follows these tiers:

• Free Plan – $0 for basic boards and limited automation

• Basic Plan – $8 per seat per month billed annually

• Standard Plan – $10 per seat per month billed annually

• Pro Plan – $16 per seat per month billed annually

• Enterprise Plan – custom pricing for advanced controls

Ratings and reviews

Organizations praise monday dev for its clear visual layout and easy adoption by cross-functional teams. Reviewers note that its strong planning and roadmap features help bridge gaps between engineering and stakeholders. Some mention that deeper development workflow needs may require add-ons or integrations.

6. GitHub Issues (Best for lightweight tracking inside your repo)

GitHub Issues is a basic issue and bug tracking feature built into every GitHub repository. It lets developers create issues directly alongside their code and link them to commits, pull requests, and project boards. Because it lives inside the repository, it provides tight traceability from bugs to code changes. GitHub Issues can be enhanced with labels, milestones, and projects to organize work and priorities. While simpler than standalone bug trackers, it offers everything smaller teams need to track issues without switching tools.

Best features

• Issue creation inside the code repository

• Labeling, milestones, and project boards for organization

• Tight integration with commits and pull requests

• Notifications and team mentions

• No additional setup for teams already using GitHub

Limitations

• Not as feature-rich for workflow customization as dedicated trackers

• Reporting and analytics are limited compared to advanced tools

• Boards and views are simpler than full project platforms

• Best for teams already using GitHub rather than as a standalone tracker

Pricing

GitHub Issues is included with GitHub plans:

• Free Plan – $0 per user per month with public and private repos

• Team Plan – $4 per user per month billed annually

• Enterprise Plan – starts at $21 per user per month billed annually

Ratings and reviews

GitHub Issues earns positive feedback from developer teams who appreciate integrated issue tracking with code management. Users highlight its simplicity and usefulness for small to medium projects. Some larger teams choose to augment it with additional reporting or integrations.

7. BugHerd (Best for visual website QA and client feedback)

BugHerd is a visual feedback and bug tracking tool designed for website projects. It lets users capture issues directly on web pages by clicking elements that need fixes. Screen captures, browser details, and annotations are automatically attached, creating clear and actionable bug reports. This makes BugHerd a strong choice for web development teams that work with clients or non-technical stakeholders who can point to problems visually. Teams can organize bugs, assign owners, track status, and manage priorities inside BugHerd’s simple interface.

Best features

• Visual feedback directly on live web pages

• Automatic capture of browser, device, and CSS information

• Clear task boards for bug tracking and prioritization

• Collaboration tools for internal and client comments

• Simple setup and intuitive interface

Limitations

• More focused on website QA than internal software processes

• Not ideal for deep development workflows outside of web UI tasks

• Pricing can be high for small teams with tight budgets

• Limited advanced automation and developer integrations

Pricing

BugHerd pricing is structured per user and includes:

• Starter Plan – $39 per user per month billed annually

• Team Plan – $69 per user per month billed annually

• Pro Plan – $99 per user per month billed annually

• Enterprise Plan – custom pricing for large organizations

Ratings and reviews

BugHerd receives strong praise for its visual bug reporting and ease of client feedback. Users note that capturing issues directly on pages saves time and reduces misunderstanding. Some teams mention that its focus on visual QA makes it less suited as a general bug tracker for back-end issues.

8. MantisBT (Best for open-source teams that want simple, reliable bug tracking)

MantisBT is an open-source bug and issue tracking system that is easy to install, use, and customize. It focuses on core bug tracking without extra complexity, making it ideal for teams that want a lightweight, straightforward tool. Users can track bugs, feature requests, and tasks, set priorities, and configure workflows. Because it is open-source, teams can modify the software to fit their exact needs. MantisBT also supports plugins and email notifications, helping teams stay updated on issue changes without needing a full project management suite.

Best features

• Open-source and free to use with full access to source code

• Simple, easy-to-navigate interface for bug tracking

• Customizable fields, workflows, and issue statuses

• Email notifications for issue updates

• Plugin support for extended functionality

• Role-based access control for team permissions

Limitations

• Interface looks dated compared to modern SaaS tools

• Lacks advanced project planning or agile features

• Requires hosting and maintenance by the team

• Integrations with external developer tools are limited unless custom built

Pricing

MantisBT is completely free to use. There is no subscription or licensing cost because it is open-source software. Hosting costs depend on the team’s server or cloud infrastructure choice.

Ratings and reviews

Users appreciate MantisBT for its simplicity and reliability. Many teams praise it for providing essential bug tracking without complex setup. Some users note that the interface and feature set feel basic by modern standards, but this simplicity is exactly what many small or open-source teams want.

9. Bugzilla (Best for enterprise-proven open-source control)

Bugzilla is a widely known open-source bug and issue tracking system trusted by many large organizations. It provides robust tracking capabilities, detailed search and reporting, advanced permissions, and customizable workflows. Bugzilla records extensive history for bugs and supports complex query filters that help teams zero in on priorities and trends. While Bugzilla’s interface may seem traditional, its reliability, scalability, and advanced control options make it suited for large engineering teams and enterprises that require stable and proven tracking systems.

Best features

• Powerful search and filtering for deep issue insights

• Advanced user permissions and role controls

• Custom fields and workflows

• Built-in reporting and trend analysis

• Email notifications and automated reminders

• Handles large volumes of issues without slowdowns

Limitations

• Outdated interface compared to modern SaaS trackers

• Requires hosting and technical maintenance

• Lacks built-in integrations with many modern development tools

• Setup and customization can require technical expertise

Pricing

Bugzilla is fully free and open-source. There are no subscription or licensing fees. Teams only pay for hosting and any support services they arrange.

Ratings and reviews

Reviewers value Bugzilla’s mature and stable platform. Teams handling large projects appreciate its query power and permission controls. Some users find the interface antiquated and less intuitive than newer products, but its proven reliability earns respect among technical and enterprise audiences.

10. Roundup (Best for minimalist teams that want an email-friendly tracker)

Roundup is a simple issue and bug tracking system designed to be flexible and email-centric. It supports both web and email interfaces for creating and updating issues, making it ideal for teams that prefer managing bugs through email interactions. Roundup can be customized with templates and skins, and it supports workflows with status tracking, custom fields, and notifications. Its emphasis on simplicity and straightforward communication makes it a good choice for small technical teams or volunteer projects that do not need heavyweight project management tools.

Best features

• Email-driven issue creation and updates

• Simple and lightweight bug tracking interface

• Flexible workflows with custom fields and trackers

• Good choice for teams that prefer email communication

• Open-source and customizable

Limitations

• Very basic compared to full bug tracker platforms

• Interface and experience are less modern and polished

• Few built-in integrations with modern development ecosystems

• Requires self-hosting and maintenance

Pricing

Roundup is free to use as open-source software. There are no licensing or subscription fees, and teams only pay for hosting infrastructure if needed.

Ratings and reviews

Users who prefer email-centric workflows rate Roundup highly for simplicity and ease of use. Teams that want more advanced project planning or tracking features find it too basic. Overall it is appreciated among small technical communities and open-source enthusiasts.

Read More: 9 Best Sococo Alternatives for Virtual Team Collaboration & Office

Additional Helpful Tools

1. Sentry

Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform used by development teams to catch software issues in real time. Rather than only tracking bugs reported manually, Sentry detects errors automatically in code running in development, staging, or production. When an error occurs, Sentry captures context such as stack traces, environment details, and user actions that led to the issue. This helps engineers understand the root cause without guessing or reproducing the problem manually. Sentry also groups similar errors, reducing noise and making it easier to prioritize fixes. Teams can configure alert thresholds and send notifications through Slack, email, or other tools. While Sentry is not a traditional bug tracker like ClickUp or Jira, its automated error reporting pairs well with them, giving teams early insights into issues that would otherwise go unnoticed.

Sentry’s pricing typically includes a free tier that covers basic error monitoring and a usage-based paid tier. Paid plans are based on the number of monthly events (errors and transactions) and start with affordable options for small teams. Higher tiers include advanced performance monitoring, larger event quotas, and prioritized support.

2. Postman

Postman is a collaboration platform for building, testing, and documenting APIs. API testing is a critical part of modern software development, and Postman helps teams define requests, validate responses, and ensure endpoints behave as expected. With Postman, QA engineers and developers can create automated test suites that run continuously or as part of a CI/CD pipeline. Tests can check for correct data structures, status codes, performance baselines, and security validations. Postman also offers mock servers and monitors that simulate API behavior and track uptime or performance over time.

Although Postman is not a bug tracker in the traditional sense, it plays an important role in preventing bugs from entering the system in the first place. When API tests fail, teams get immediate insight into issues that would otherwise be filed later as bugs. Postman’s plans include a Free tier with basic features, a Team plan for collaboration, and Enterprise tiers for organization-wide testing governance and API lifecycle management.

3. BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that lets developers and QA teams test applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers. Because bugs often appear only in specific environments, BrowserStack removes the need to maintain extensive in-house device labs. Testers can run automated Selenium or Appium scripts and manually test interactions on real mobile phones, tablets, and desktop browsers. BrowserStack also supports visual regression testing, ensuring layouts and styling remain correct across changes.

For bug tracking, BrowserStack complements issue trackers by providing reliable reproduction environments. When a bug is found, developers and testers can attach screenshots or logs from BrowserStack sessions directly to ticketing tools like Jira or GitHub Issues. Pricing typically includes Free trials, Live Testing plans for interactive sessions, and Automate plans for automated tests. BrowserStack also offers team and enterprise options with more parallel sessions, device access, and collaboration features.

4. TestRail

TestRail is a test case management tool that helps QA teams design, organize, and run tests systematically. Instead of scattered spreadsheets or ad-hoc tests, TestRail provides a structured way to build test suites, track test execution, and measure coverage. Teams can link test results directly to bug trackers such as Jira or GitHub Issues. When a test fails, TestRail records the steps, expected vs. actual results, and environment details, making it faster for developers to reproduce and fix the issue.

TestRail’s reporting provides insights into pass/fail rates, testing trends over time, and team productivity. Its interface supports milestones, test runs, and user roles for collaborative work. Pricing includes a hosted cloud service with per-user monthly subscriptions and options for self-hosted installations for teams that require data control. TestRail’s plans usually start with basic project support and scale up to enterprise features like single sign-on and API access.

Read More: Top 7 Case Management Solutions

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is the best free alternative to Zoho BugTracker?

The best free alternative depends on your team’s workflow, but several options stand out. GitHub Issues is an excellent choice if your team uses GitHub for code hosting, as it offers integrated issue tracking at no cost. MantisBT and Bugzilla are open-source, self-hosted systems with no subscription fees, making them ideal for teams with technical resources who want complete control without ongoing costs. ClickUp also offers a Free plan with basic issue and task tracking that can handle small projects. Each of these tools provides reliable bug tracking with no licensing costs, though they vary in features and scalability.

2. Can I migrate all my data from Zoho BugTracker to another tool?

Migrating data from Zoho BugTracker to another platform is possible, but the ease and completeness depend on both the source and destination tools. Most modern trackers support CSV or JSON import formats, allowing you to export issues, statuses, comments, and attachments from Zoho and upload them into the new system. Some tools have built-in importers tailored to popular platforms. In other cases, third-party migration tools or scripts may be used to map fields correctly. When planning a migration, it’s important to back up your data, map fields between systems carefully, and test the migration process in a sandbox environment before performing it on production data. Complex workflows or custom fields may need manual adjustment after import.

3. Which tool integrates best with GitHub or Bitbucket?

Tools that offer tight, native integration with GitHub and Bitbucket include GitHub Issues and Jira. GitHub Issues works inside GitHub repos, linking issues directly with commits, branches, and pull requests. This creates a seamless connection between code and issues. Jira has deep integrations with both GitHub and Bitbucket through built-in connectors, letting teams transition work from code to issue and back without friction. ClickUp also integrates smoothly with Git systems and chat tools, giving teams real-time updates when code linked to issues changes. When integration with version control is a priority, these tools reduce manual updates and improve traceability between code changes and tracked bugs.

4. What’s the best Zoho BugTracker alternative for small development teams?

For small teams, lightweight and easy-to-adopt tools are often best. GitHub Issues is ideal if the team already uses GitHub for version control, providing bug tracking directly inside repositories. ClickUp’s Free or lower-tier plans offer flexible bug tracking with multiple views and automations without steep learning or cost. MantisBT is a strong open-source option if your team prefers self-hosting and simplicity. These tools cover core bug tracking needs with minimal setup and cost, making them suitable for small teams and startup environments.

5. Which alternatives include AI or automation for issue tracking?

Automation and AI support is becoming more common in modern bug and issue trackers. ClickUp includes automation rules that trigger actions based on predefined conditions, reducing manual work for repetitive tasks. ClickUp’s AI features can help generate summaries, suggest task changes, and assist with descriptions. Jira supports automation rules that can update issues, notify teams, and enforce workflow rules. GitLab’s pipelines automate testing and deployment tied to issue statuses. While not all tools have built-in AI, many support automation and integrations that help streamline tracking, reduce manual updates, and accelerate resolution workflows.

Read More: 11 Best Attio Alternatives to Try in 2026